
If I've applied to a paper before and either got a form-letter rejection or no reaction, is it wise to approach the same paper again for a job opening, particularly if the same people are in place?
ASK JOE A QUESTION
|
To get your question answered on this page, send it to Joe. Please include your full name in your message. If you prefer that your surname not be published, please indicate that. Sign up to receive Ask The Recruiter by e-mail: * Click here (sent Monday-Friday at 8 a.m.) |
|
The cynic in me says if they didn't flip the first time around, what makes me think they had a change in heart now?
On the other hand ...
Bill

Because we don't know why your previous application didn't lead to a job, I would try again.
Here are half a dozen reasons why you might be a good candidate this time, even though they took a pass on you previously:
- A different, more suitable position is open.
- The first time around, the opening evaporated or got frozen, and no one at all was hired.
- You've grown.
- The job went to a better candidate and no such competition has applied this time.
- Your application fell through a crack.
- The job requirements have changed (more online experience, increased need for a foreign language) that play to you and make you much more competitive.
Of course, this is all guesswork. I think I'd call the hiring editor for this position and ask what they are looking for. Don't mention that you have been rejected before.
Coming Wednesday: She is up for a position that she thinks she is overqualified for, but that will get her back into journalism. The problem is knowing how long to stay in it before moving.
Back when I was trying to break into the news...