Poynter Online
Go


Top Story

Putting Voters in the Analyst's Seat
Most Recent Articles
Most E-mailed
Recent Comments
Recent Tags
Community Activity

Poynter Training
Poynter Seminars
Small, in-person training experiences.
News University
Today's most popular courses on NewsU, Poynter's e-learning site for journalists.
Webinars
Our online classroom is just a click away. Learn more.
All Webinars

Journalists' Rights Tracker

Home > Journalists' Rights Tracker
Tools: Text Sizeor, Print, RSSRSS, Subscribe via e-mail
Leann Frola
A digest of coverage of journalists' rights and legal issues.

A state-by-state guide to journalists' legal protections

Scholastic Journalists' Rights

Pending federal shield law legislation:
S. 2831
S. 1419
S. 340
H.R. 3323
H.R. 581


Senate Judiciary Committee hearings:

I."Reporters' Shield Legislation: Issues and Implications" (July 20, 2005)
II. "Reporters' Privilege Legislation: An Additional Investigation of Issues and Implications" (Oct. 19, 2005)
III. "Reporters' Privilege Legislation: Preserving Effective Law Enforcement" (Sept. 20, 2006)

Testimony:
I.
William Safire
Rep. Mike Pence
Matthew Cooper
Norman Pearlstine
Floyd Abrams
Lee Levine
Geoffrey Stone
II.
Chuck Rosenberg
Judith Miller
David Westin
Joseph E. diGenova
Ann Gordon
Dale Davenport
Steven D. Clymer
III.
Victor E. Schwartz
Theodore B. Olson
Steven D. Clymer
Paul J. McNulty

Member statements:
I.
Sen. Patrick Leahy
Sen. Richard Lugar
Sen. Russ Feingold
II.
Sen. John Cornyn
Sen. Patrick Leahy
III.
Sen. Patrick Leahy


For more on journalists' rights internationally:
Committee to Protect Journalists



By Brian Hudson
Student Press Law Center
Feb. 21, 2007

Excerpt:

The administration at the University of Missouri at Rolla announced Monday that it did not find any evidence of censorship when the school's student government voted to cut the student newspaper's funding.

Editors now are searching for both legal representation and evidence to corroborate their claim of censorship.

The newspaper, which claims the funding cut was motivated by its content, had delivered an ultimatum to campus leaders last week saying that if the funding dispute was not resolved by Monday, it would pursue legal action.

The university's general counsel said in a letter to the newspaper that because it had not found evidence supporting the newspaper's claims, the administration would not intervene and restore funding. The letter does, however, invite the editors to submit any evidence that would justify their claim that the budget cut was based on content.


Posted by Leann Frola 12:00 AM Feb 21, 2007
Tools:
Comment, e-mail, Permalink, Share
Username
Password
New User? Signup Now
Poynter Careers