Poynter Online
Go


Top Story

'Going Deep' with Sports Illustrated's Gary Smith
Most Recent Articles
Most E-mailed
Recent Comments
Recent Tags
Community Activity

Poynter Training
Poynter Seminars
Small, in-person training experiences.
News University
Today's most popular courses on NewsU, Poynter's e-learning site for journalists.
Webinars
Our online classroom is just a click away. Learn more.
All Webinars

Journalists' Rights Tracker

Home > Journalists' Rights Tracker
Tools: Text Sizeor, Print, RSSRSS, Subscribe via e-mail
Leann Frola
A digest of coverage of journalists' rights and legal issues.

A state-by-state guide to journalists' legal protections

Scholastic Journalists' Rights

Pending federal shield law legislation:
S. 2831
S. 1419
S. 340
H.R. 3323
H.R. 581


Senate Judiciary Committee hearings:

I."Reporters' Shield Legislation: Issues and Implications" (July 20, 2005)
II. "Reporters' Privilege Legislation: An Additional Investigation of Issues and Implications" (Oct. 19, 2005)
III. "Reporters' Privilege Legislation: Preserving Effective Law Enforcement" (Sept. 20, 2006)

Testimony:
I.
William Safire
Rep. Mike Pence
Matthew Cooper
Norman Pearlstine
Floyd Abrams
Lee Levine
Geoffrey Stone
II.
Chuck Rosenberg
Judith Miller
David Westin
Joseph E. diGenova
Ann Gordon
Dale Davenport
Steven D. Clymer
III.
Victor E. Schwartz
Theodore B. Olson
Steven D. Clymer
Paul J. McNulty

Member statements:
I.
Sen. Patrick Leahy
Sen. Richard Lugar
Sen. Russ Feingold
II.
Sen. John Cornyn
Sen. Patrick Leahy
III.
Sen. Patrick Leahy


For more on journalists' rights internationally:
Committee to Protect Journalists



By Walter Pincus
The Washington Post
Sept. 24, 2006

Excerpt:

The Senate Judiciary Committee has postponed consideration of a federal shield law for journalists after hearing strong new objections to the measure from the Justice Department.

The postponement all but guarantees that there will be no Senate action on the measure until Congress returns after the November elections. Even then, passage of the legislation is doubtful given powerful opposition in the House and from the Bush administration, according to congressional aides and non-government supporters of the measure.

One focus of administration opposition is a provision that would require the Justice Department, to obtain a journalist's testimony about sources of a leak of national security information, to convince a judge that the disclosure caused more harm to the government than benefit to the public. The judge would have to weigh the possible danger to national security against the public's right to know the information.

Under current law, no such balancing test is administered by a judge. Instead, a journalist who is subpoenaed to give up the source of such a national security leak has no protection unless he can prove the government's request is unreasonable or a form of harassment.

Posted by Leann Frola 12:00 AM Sep 24, 2006
Tools:
Comment, e-mail, Permalink, Share
Username
Password
New User? Signup Now
Poynter Careers