Poynter Online
Go


Top Story

A New Generation of Visual Thinkers, Going Where Journalism Takes Them
Most Recent Articles
Most E-mailed
Recent Comments
Recent Tags
Community Activity

Poynter Training
Poynter Seminars
Small, in-person training experiences.
News University
Today's most popular courses on NewsU, Poynter's e-learning site for journalists.
Webinars
Our online classroom is just a click away. Learn more.
All Webinars

Everyday Ethics

Home > Ethics & Diversity > Everyday Ethics
Tools: Text Sizeor, Print, RSSRSS, Subscribe via e-mail
Kelly McBride
Updates on ethical decision-making in newsrooms big and small, assembled by Poynter's Kelly McBride, Bob Steele and colleagues.

 



Posted by Kelly McBride 11:31 AM February 13, 2006
Private vs. Public: A Journalist in the News
   
RELATED RESOURCES

LaMarre case proves classic ethics issue (Roanoke Times)

Index of coverage of Lamarre story by WSLS

WSLS in Roanoke found itself in a tight spot last week. Everything is out in the open now. But it wasn't for several days. On Feb. 2 Meteorologist Marc Lamarre was admitted to a local hospital in critical condition from a heroin overdose. Police investigated and eventually arrested the dealer. But Lamarre's name was removed from the official documents. On the record, no one was confirming anything about his involvement or his condition. Rumors rampaged through the city. Many people thought Lamarre, a local celebrity, was dead.

    Journalists at the station got calls from their high school kids, who wanted to know why their parents were hiding the truth. Callers accused a funeral home near the station of hiding the body.

    Kathy Mohn, WSLS general manager, was in a no-win situation. Lamarre was in a hospital fighting for his life. He wasn't charged with a crime. Any information the station had generated came from personal contact, not journalistic reporting. And Lamarre wasn't conscious, so he couldn't consent to a public release.

    In the end, the station was scooped on the story. The suspected drug dealer's lawyer had a copy of the affidavit with the names of the overdose victims included. He confirmed, on the record, that Lamarre was the man in the hospital bed.

    Although the station was embarrassed, they didn't have a lot of options. They later explained to the public a decision-making process they went through, which included involvement from owner Media General and input from a news director at a sister station in Colorado who had no knowledge of the people involved.

    Ultimately there was minor journalistic purpose to the story involving Lamarre. A local celebrity OD'd on heroin. People were curious. They wanted to know what happened. Sure the station had an obligation to tell the whole story. But the public had little to gain by getting the information earlier rather than later. There is a greater obligation to examine the impact of heroin in the community and the capacity of law enforcement to address the problem. That doesn't require revealing Lamarre's name, nor does it suggest the story be covered up.

    It's hard to make generalizations from this case. The only truism is that journalists must report on their own and when it happens, it requires a careful examination of loyalties and obligations.
Tools:
Comment, e-mail, Permalink, Share
View items published between:   &   
(MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY)
Username
Password
New User? Signup Now
Poynter Careers
Ask The Recruiter Ask The Recruiter Friday: How Bad is a Gap in My Clips?
Colleen on Careers Colleen on Careers You Worked Hard to Get the Interview, Make it Count