Los Angeles Times
"Lots of readers say we ought to quit kidding ourselves [about being objective], because we're not kidding them," writes
Dana Parsons. "Better to just come out and show where you stand. If that means marching at antiwar rallies or handing out anti-abortion pamphlets, so be it. Bad idea. Believe it or not, we are trying to cover these controversial social issues with objectivity. And we still have the belief that people belonging to Greenpeace, for example, shouldn't be covering the environment."
>
Jon Friedman: Is it an ethical breach for political reporters to vote in elections?
(Marketwatch)
Objectivity is a specious concept when discussed in general terms....
