Wall Street Journal
Sarah Ellison notes the agreement isn't as detailed as, say, a rule book for a sports event. "Much of the wording is vague, leaving operations to mutual agreement between the two parties," she writes. "And the ability to enforce the agreement legally is less crucial than the ability of reporters and editors to win attention for their grievances." ||
LAT editorial: The agreement is "an unusual and ironic concession, given the free-market blandishments in the Journal's editorials."
>
Bancroft lawyers in Boston expected to make final decision on deal (WSJ)
>
Barron's has been ignored in the editorial integrity discussions (Weiss)
>
Dow Jones saga has Greenway thinking about Murdoch's dad in WWI (BG)
