Poynter Online
Go


Top Story

When Photojournalists Get Stuck Between Police, Protesters
Most Recent Articles
Most E-mailed
Recent Comments
Recent Tags
Community Activity

Poynter Training
Poynter Seminars
Small, in-person training experiences.
News University
Today's most popular courses on NewsU, Poynter's e-learning site for journalists.
Webinars
Our online classroom is just a click away. Learn more.
All Webinars

E-Media Tidbits

Home > E-Media Tidbits
Tools: Text Sizeor, Print, RSSRSS, Subscribe via e-mail
Amy Gahran
A group weblog by the sharpest minds in online media
PoynterGroups.
Find and join conversations about E-Media Tidbits or Online & Multimedia.


Posted by Amy Gahran 11:28 AM September 25, 2006
Michael Kinsley on the Future of Newspapers

Kinsley
Slate
Slate's Michael Kinsley believes the news will survive, but not the paper.
Yesterday in Time, Slate's Michael Kinsely asked, Do Newspapers Have a Future? (Jim Romenesko already mentioned this, but I think it bears further exploration -- especially since Time doesn't support online comments, grumble grumble...)

Anyway, Kinsley wrote: "The fact that people won't pay for news on the Internet isn't as devastating for the old medium as it seems. People don't pay for their news in traditional newspapers: they pay for the paper, which typically costs the company more than it charges for the finished product. So in theory, giving away the news without the paper looks like a good deal for newspapers, if they can keep the advertising."

I'm wondering, does this ring true for those of you in the news industry? I realize that the capital and supply costs are high for print papers, but salaries are, after all, another huge expense. I'd love to hear from others whether this reflects economic realities for newspapers.

Also, in light of Ernst Poulsen's post earlier today, I wonder if breakthroughs in decent, cheap, flexible e-paper technology might not revolutionize the newspaper business -- even though that technology still has a long, long way to go.

Kinsley also wrote: "The 'me to you' model of news gathering -- a professional reporter, attuned to the fine distinctions between 'off the record' and 'deep background,' prizing factual accuracy in the narrowest sense -- may well give way to some kind of 'us to us' communitarian arrangement of the sort that thrives on the Internet. But there is room between the New York Times and myleftarmpit.com for new forms that liberate journalism from its encrusted conceits while preserving its standards, like accuracy."

I'm glad he said that, since there is ample room for credible, useful news that lies between traditional journalism and a one-way trip to hell in a handbasket. Not to mention that all models of news gathering and reporting can peacefully co-exist.

(UPDATE 11AM MST: On Sept. 23, the Innovations in Newspapers blog covered  predictions offered by Earl Wilkinson executive director of of the International Newspaper Maketing Association at the recent INMA European Conference in Barcelona.)

Tools:
Comment, e-mail, Permalink, Share
Recent Comments:
Is Web Ad Revenue to Print Ad Revenue as Web Readership to Print Readership? That's the question that will determine the future of the... More.
Read All Comments (1 comments)
View items published between:   &   
(MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY)
Username
Password
New User? Signup Now
Poynter Careers
Ask The Recruiter Ask The Recruiter Friday: How Bad is a Gap in My Clips?
Colleen on Careers Colleen on Careers You Worked Hard to Get the Interview, Make it Count