Four thousand high school students who took the SAT
last October received scores, in some cases, 100 points lower than they
should have. Those who are affected should know it by today. Here is
the
Web site of the College Board, which
runs the SAT.
The Board claims the mistakes were a one-time event
and do not have any bearing on previous tests from previous years.
The New York Times reports:
The College Board, which administers the SAT, said it had begun to
notify college admissions offices, high school counselors and affected
students this week in letters and in e-mail messages, and expected to
complete the process by Thursday. It also said that it planned to
return registration fees and charges for sending test scores to
colleges to the students whose scores were in error.
The disclosure came at the height of the college admissions season, at
a time when many colleges have already made many of their decisions
about which students to accept, reject or defer.
"We ask that you do everything you can to ensure that students are in
no way penalized for a matter that was beyond their control," Jim
Montoya, a vice president of the College Board, wrote in a letter to
deans and admissions directors dated March 6.
The company that administers the test said it learned about the
potential problems in December when a couple of students questioned
their scores. It is unclear why it has taken so long to notify the
thousands of others who were affected. In perspective, the number of
tests affected so far is about eight-tenths of one percent of the
495,000 students who took the test.
Colleges got letters this week, and they're now are scrambling to re-evaluate
their responses to requests for scholarships and admissions.
AMA Warns Girls Not to Go Wild
The American Medical
Association has a warning for female college students who are about to
take off for spring break. I'm not sure why they do not have a similar
warning for guys. A new poll released by the AMA says:
- A majority (74 percent) of respondents said women use drinking as an excuse for outrageous behavior.
- More than half of women (57 percent) agree being promiscuous is a way to fit in.
- An overwhelming majority (83 percent) of women had friends who drank the majority of the nights while on spring break.
- More than half (59 percent) know friends who were sexually active with more than one partner.
- Nearly three out of five women know friends who had unprotected sex during spring break.
- One in five
respondents regretted the sexual activity they engaged in during spring
break, and 12 percent felt forced or pressured into sex.
- An overwhelming
majority (84 percent) of respondents thought images of college girls
partying during spring break may contribute to an increase in females'
reckless behavior.
- An even higher percentage (86 percent) agreed these images may contribute to dangerous behaviors by males toward women.
- Almost all (92 percent) said it was easy to get alcohol while on spring break.
- Two out of five
women agreed access to free or cheap alcohol or a drinking age under
age 21 were important factors in their decision to go on a spring break
trip.
The study is critical of spring-break promoters' Web sites, and cites one that tells kids that in Cancún, they can do a year's worth of drinking in a week. That quote is years old -- I saw it on Web sites as early as 2003.
The State Department even has a warning page about Spring Break in Cancún.
Camp Crunch
CNN/Money reports:
It's estimated there
will be 11 million kids going to summer camp this year. To get into the
camp your kid wants, you should act quickly. Many camps are reaching
their occupation limit by March, says Jeff Solomon of the American Camp Association.
Parents shouldn't
wait past mid-April if they want to send their kids to camp, according
to Ann Sheets of the American Camp Association. You should also start
making your camp decisions now if you're considering a traditional
camp. They tend to fill up first, according to Chris Thurber, the
author of "The Secret Ingredients of Summer Camp Success."
There's another
benefit to being the early worm. You may get a registration discount,
says Sheets. Keep in mind that schools in some states let out earlier
than most and that means summer camp starts even earlier. In Texas, for example, schools get out in the middle of May.
The story says:
There are [more than]
5,000 day camps and 7,000 sleep-away camps. There are camps for every
kind of hobby, from sports and fine arts camps to education and test
prep camp and travel and adventure camps.
To narrow your
options, get a sense of what you can afford and what interests your
child. Then you can begin trolling the Web. The American Camp
Association runs a database of 2,400 accredited camps that you can
search by your activity and cost preference, at www.campparents.org.
March Madness Online
Here is a leap into online programming. The Los Angeles Times says:
CBS Corp. wants to inject a little madness into online media.
The
TV network plans to make all early-round games from the NCAA basketball
tournament, known as March Madness, available for free on the Internet.
When the tournament gets into full swing March 16, it will mark the
first time a major broadcaster has shifted such an important
programming franchise onto the Web without charging a subscription fee.
The March Madness on Demand service will black out local games -- plus the final three rounds
of the tournament, when only one game is played at a time -- to avoid
direct competition with CBS affiliates.
Broadband capacity will limit the Web audience to a few hundred thousand viewers at a time.
But
analysts and industry executives described the experiment as a key
inflection point in the Internet's maturation as a platform for the
distribution of video. Eighteen big-name advertisers, including
Marriott International, Dell Inc. and Pontiac, already have purchased
all the available ad spots.
Viewer Beware: Local TV and Health News
I have not seen (and
do not have) the full study -- it will not be online until Monday -- but
I can give you a top-line report on a new survey of local television
health reporting. And it's not pretty. The University of Michigan press
release says:
In the March issue of the American Journal of Managed Care,
researchers from the University of Michigan and the University of
Wisconsin-Madison report results from an in-depth analysis of health
coverage on local TV newscasts from across the country.
In all, health and
medical stories comprised 11 percent of the news portion of
late-evening newscasts in the one-month period studied, with 1,799 such
stories carried on 2,795 broadcasts captured from the representative
sample of 122 stations in the nation's top 50 media markets.
The average story was
33 seconds long, and most did not give specifics about the source of
the information presented. Items about specific diseases tended not to
contain recommendations for viewers, or information about how common
the disease was -- which could help put the news into perspective with
other health issues.
But most disturbing,
the study's authors say, were the egregious errors contained in a small
minority of studies -- errors that could have led to serious
consequences.
For instance, a story
that aired on several stations reported on lemon juice's effect on
sperm and speculated about, or presented as fact, the use of lemon
juice as an effective contraceptive, and its potential effect on
preventing sexual transmission of HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.
Despite the fact that the study was done in a research lab, nearly all
the stories failed to mention that it had not involved humans. Even
more alarming, one of the stations misinterpreted the study altogether
and stated that lemon juice may be a substitute for "costly" HIV
medications.
"Egregious errors
such as these can actually harm the public," says lead author James
Pribble, M.D., a lecturer in the Department of Emergency Medicine at
the U-M Medical School who began the study as a U-M Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholar.
"The key here is the
focus on local news," says co-author Ken Goldstein, Ph.D., a UW-Madison
professor of political science. "Local TV news is the single greatest
source of information for the majority of Americans -- whether it be
politics or health - and understanding what sorts of health information
people are being exposed to demands that we analyze the content of this
most prevalent source."
The study, when it is released Monday, will appear here.
The University of Michigan tells me that tomorrow, you will be able to find an abstract of the study here.
We are always looking for your great ideas. Send Al a few sentences and hot links.
Editor's Note: Al's Morning Meeting is a compendium of
ideas, edited story excerpts and other materials from a variety of Web
sites, as well as original concepts and analysis. When the information
comes directly from another source, it will be attributed and a link
will be provided whenever possible. The column is fact-checked, but
depends upon the accuracy and integrity of the original sources cited.
Errors and inaccuracies found will be corrected.